Inglés:The Neuroscience of Creativity, Perception, and Confirmation Bias

[Lander]

Descripcion:
Para garantizar su supervivencia, su cerebro evolucionó para evitar una cosa: incertidumbre. Como señala el neurocientífico Beau Lotto, si sus antepasados se preguntaran durante demasiado tiempo si ese ruido era un depredador o no, no estaría aquí en este momento. Nuestros cerebros están orientados a hacer suposiciones rápidas, y cuestionarlos en muchos casos literalmente equivale a la muerte. No es de extrañar que estemos tan controlados por el sesgo de confirmación. No es de extrañar que preferimos cumplir con el status quo que arriesgar la incertidumbre de un mejor modelo político, un sistema financiero más justo o un patrón de relación más saludable. Pero aquí está la captura: a medida que nuestros cerebros evolucionaron hacia la certeza, simultáneamente evolucionamos de la creatividad, que no es coincidencia; La creatividad comienza con una pregunta, con incertidumbre, no con una respuesta cortada y seca. Para ser creativos, tenemos que desaprender millones de años de evolución. La creatividad nos pide que hagamos lo que es más difícil: cuestionar nuestras suposiciones, dudar de lo que creemos que es verdad. Esa es la única forma de ver de manera diferente. Y si crees que la creatividad es una fuerza caótica y salvaje, piense de nuevo, dice Beau Lotto. Simplemente se ve así desde el exterior. El cerebro no puede hacer grandes saltos, solo puede moverse linealmente a través de las posibilidades mentales. Cuando una persona creativa forja una conexión entre dos cosas que están, en su opinión, tan separadas, ese es un caso de lógica de alto nivel. Se han movido a través de pasos que son invisibles para usted, tal vez porque son más abiertos y bien practicados al cuestionar sus suposiciones. La creatividad, al parecer, es otra forma de lógica (altamente sofisticada). Beau Lotto es el autor de Deviate: La ciencia de ver de manera diferente.


Transcripcion:
Beau Lotto: Every behavior that we do, we do to reduce uncertainty. We do it to increase certainty. When you go down below in a boat and your eyes are moving and registering the boat, and your eyes are saying, “Oh, we’re standing still,” but your inner ears are saying, “No, no, we’re moving.” And your brain cannot deal with that conflict so it gets ill.

The stress resulting from uncertainty is tremendous in our society. It increases brain cell death. It decreases plasticity. It makes you a more extreme version of yourself. We do almost everything to avoid uncertainty. And yet the irony is that that’s the only place we can go if we’re ever going to see differently. And that’s why creativity, seeing differently, always begins in the same way: it begins with a question. It begins with not knowing. It begins with a 'why?'. It begins with a 'what if?'.

And I should also say that these assumptions are essential for your survival. Every time you take a step your brain has hundreds of assumptions: that the floor is not going to give way, that your legs aren’t going to give way, that that’s not a hole, it’s a surface. So these assumptions keep us alive. But they can also get in the way, because what was once useful may no longer be useful. So your brain evolved to evolve. It's adapted to adapt. So a deep question is: how is it possible to ever see differently if everything you see is a reflex grounded in your history of assumptions?

Our assumptions—and the process of vision—is both our constraint and our savior at the same time. Because our brain evolved to take what is meaningless and make it meaningful. If you’re not sure that was a predator, it was too late. So your brain evolved to take this meaningless data and make meaning from it, and that’s the process of creating perception. And then we hold on to those assumptions. They create attractor states in your brain, right, and they become very stable. So how could we see differently? It’s by engaging the process of creating perception.
Well the first step in that is to not just admit but embody the fact that everything you do right now is grounded in your assumptions—not sometimes, but all the time. Because if you don’t accept that then you’ll never create the possibility of seeing differently.

So much of 'Deviate', if people walk away with anything, it’s knowing the process of perception and in some sense I want them to know less at the end than they think they know now, because nothing interesting begins with knowing, it begins with not knowing. Because the next step is to then identify your assumptions—because most of everything that we do, we don’t know why we do what we do—and then the final step is to question those assumptions.

But questioning assumptions is incredibly difficult, because to question assumptions, to doubt what you assumed to be true already, especially if that assumption defines who you are, is to do the one thing that our brain evolved to avoid, which is uncertainty.

In fact, uncertainty is such a difficult, dangerous thing, that evolution has created a brain that tries to avoid it altogether, to the extent that we have things like confirmation bias, where we’ll start looking for evidence to confirm what we assume to be true already. That we would rather hold onto assumptions that we know don’t work, because that is safer (we think) than questioning them and stepping into a place that we don’t actually know, even though that other place might be a great deal better than where we are.

This actually exists all the time within politics. It exists within the concept of the negative view of U-turns, where we ridicule politicians for changing their mind because they got new evidence. We want them to hold onto the same path despite the evidence, which actually shifts them much more towards a belief as opposed to anything that’s evidence driven.

So this also leads on to the idea of whether or not the brain ever does big jumps, or does it only ever do small steps? And the answer is, the brain only ever does small steps. I can only get from here to the other side of the room by passing through the space in between. I can’t teleport myself to the other side.

Similarly your brain only ever makes small steps in its ideas. So whenever you’re in a moment it can only actually shift itself to the next most-likely possible. And the next most likely possible is determined by its assumptions. We call it the space of possibility. You can’t do just anything. Some things are just impossible for you in terms of your perception or in terms of your conception of the world. What’s possible is based on your history.

So what that means is, where does that leave us with creativity, which we have this concept that you’re linking two things that are very far apart? But if the brain never does big jumps, what’s really happening?

And the idea is that, for the person being creative, all they’re doing is making a small step to the next most likely possibility based on their assumptions. But when someone on the outside sees them doing that they think, “Wow, how did they put those two things that are far apart together?” And the reason why it seems that way is because for the observer they are far apart, they have a different space of possibility. And in their space of possibility they exist way over here.

So creativity in this sense is only creative from the outside, not from the inside. For the person being creative they’re making a logical next step. The difference is that their space of possibility is different. They have different assumptions, different biases. In fact they might have a more complex space of possibility, because they have more complex biases and assumptions. Maybe they had a more open attitude to when they experienced other cultures, et cetera, and they assimilated more complex assumptions. So they have more directions in which they can move within their space of possibility.

So we interpret that as them being creative by linking things that are far apart. But, in fact, it’s a logical process of making small steps, changing your space of possibility by identifying and then questioning your assumptions.

https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/beau-lo ... -of-logic/

Enlace traducido :

https://bigthink-com.translate.goog/neu ... r_pto=wapp

[Tupac Amaru]

Pobre Lander, la Neurociencia es a perce la fusión de muchas ciencias, con cortar y pegar vainas de internet no le bastará para no abandonar los temas como es su costumbre, por más que El Comando Bufanda acuda a rascarse el lomo entre ellos.

Tendrá está caterva de copiomanos la capacidad para desplegarse a profundidad en LA Neuroplasticidad?

Ya foristas como El Barón Harkonne hannasimando elementos propios de la Neurociencia, quedando la caterva resagada ante la imposibilidad del debate desde su postura copiomana.

Que hará Lander cuando desde la Epistemología de su Conocimiento le pidan explicar el modelo de Urie Brofenbrenner?

Sabrá algo acerca de la Neurogénesis?

En fin, que comience el desnalgue progre

[Tupac Amaru]

El Comando Bufanda no se ocupó de este pegoste

[Quinoa]

So we interpret that as them being creative by linking things that are far apart. But, in fact, it’s a logical process of making small steps, changing your space of possibility by identifying and then questioning your assumptions

Por eso los progres cancelan a los que son creativos y son capaces de hacer conexiones y questionarse. Un hombre es mujer punto no hay más que decir
ni que inventar, un mundo progresista no evoluciona sino que se deprava.

[gines a]

Demasiado para este foro. Como muestra las respuestas anteriores.

[Quinoa]

Demasiado para este foro. Como muestra las respuestas anteriores

Por eso eres forista en este foro? Una lumbrera de tu "ranking" (como decía Chavez)y estas metido aquí todo el tiempo? Jajajajaja que vacilón

[Tupac Amaru]

Demasiado para este foro. Como muestra las respuestas anteriores.

No te he leído expresar nada con relación al tema, será que entendieron que este tópico no lo pueden llevar a punta e copies and paste y prefieren hacer lo de costumbre, huir cual ignorantes enquintados?

[verdinegro]

So we interpret that as them being creative by linking things that are far apart. But, in fact, it’s a logical process of making small steps, changing your space of possibility by identifying and then questioning your assumptions

Por eso los progres cancelan a los que son creativos y son capaces de hacer conexiones y questionarse. Un hombre es mujer punto no hay más que decir
ni que inventar, un mundo progresista no evoluciona sino que se deprava.

Qué triste es ser transfóbico.

[Tupac Amaru]

Otro tema de Lander que busca justificar su homosexualidad, seguramente nos vendrá que en el se produce una muy eleva producción de dopamina y como él es admirador de Abraham Maslow, pues debe satisfacer su principal necesidad, la fisiológica

[Axio]

yo dudo de todo, hasta de esta realidad.

prefiero ser creativo y pensar que vivimos en una simulación virtual controlada por algún perverso psicópata que solo le gusta manejar el destino mediante eventos determinísticos discretos a discreción.

[Tupac Amaru]

yo dudo de todo, hasta de esta realidad.

prefiero ser creativo y pensar que vivimos en una simulación virtual controlada por algún perverso psicópata que solo le gusta manejar el destino mediante eventos determinísticos discretos a discreción.

Si no fuera porque en ti priva el deseo de perturbar se podría pensar que eres relativista, pero no, si Kant estuviera vivo se habría infartado de solo leerte

[Quinoa]

Qué triste es ser transfóbico

Más o menos y en este caso tu lo que pasa es que tu cerebro le tiene miedo a la incertidumbre, tienes terror de sentarse que un hombre es una mujer aunque los genes no mienten pero es cuestión de creatividad y percepción, por allí va la cotorra.

Otra favorita es, tienen miedo a los cambios, no evolucionan ha ja ja

Si soy transfóbica, no me gustan los hombres maquillados y con tetas.

[Tupac Amaru]

Qué triste es ser transfóbico

Más o menos y en este caso tu lo que pasa es que tu cerebro le tiene miedo a la incertidumbre, tienes terror de sentarse que un hombre es una mujer aunque los genes no mienten pero es cuestión de creatividad y percepción, por allí va la cotorra.

Otra favorita es, tienen miedo a los cambios, no evolucionan ha ja ja

Si soy transfóbica, no me gustan los hombres maquillados y con tetas.

No es solo eso, este se leyó minuciosamente a Rene Descartes y lo que más le impactó fue la frase de la duda surge el conocimiento", ergo, piensa que de su duda en cuanto al genero, surgirá ese conocimiento que es "EUREKA" mujer