Compartir en las Redes !
Moscu bajo ataque
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Los yihadistas:
- NO usan la mano izquierda.
- NO reciben dinero a cambio.
- Usualmente se inmolan.
A otro perro con ese hueso con eso del "ISIS".
- NO usan la mano izquierda.
- NO reciben dinero a cambio.
- Usualmente se inmolan.
A otro perro con ese hueso con eso del "ISIS".
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
- Senderos
- Mensajes: 8768
- Registrado: Dom Dic 12, 2021 3:59 pm
- Ubicación: https://www.mossad.gov.il/
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
En una ojeada a las repsuestas que le escriben en x nadie le está creyendo esa teoría.
Por todas las redes (al igual que las mentiras de Hamas/pallywood) se ha viralizado culpar a Isis del ataque.
Jews Are The Only Indigenous of The Ancestral Land of Israel
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Extracto de Wikipedia:
De ser así, este Douglas McGregor parace es un propagandista ruso...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Macgregor022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
After Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Macgregor appeared on three Fox News programs in February and early March to speak in support of Russia's actions. Three days after the war began, he said "The battle in eastern Ukraine is really almost over," and predicted "If [Ukraine] don't surrender in the next 24 hours, I suspect Russia will ultimately annihilate them." Macgregor said he believed Russia should be allowed to seize whatever parts of Ukraine it wanted. In his second appearance, he revised his prediction: "The first five days Russian forces I think frankly were too gentle. They've now corrected that. So, I would say another 10 days this should be completely over... I think the most heroic thing he could do right now is come to terms with reality. Neutralize Ukraine." After one of his appearances, Macgregor's comments were characterized by veteran Fox News Pentagon correspondent Jennifer Griffin as "distorting" and "appeasement" and that he was being an "apologist" for Putin. After Griffin's remarks, Tucker Carlson — who hosted Macgregor on two successive nights — remarked, "Unlike many of the so-called reporters you see on television, he is not acting secretly as a flack for Lloyd Austin at the Pentagon. No, Doug Macgregor is an honest man." Trey Gowdy, another Fox News host who interviewed Macgregor, said his viewpoint was "stunning and disappointing".[9][55][56][57][10][58]
Russian state television channels RT and VGTRK broadcast excerpts of Macgregor's second Carlson appearance, which included a characterization of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a "puppet," that Russian forces had been "too gentle" in the early days of the invasion and that Russian president Vladimir Putin was being "demonized" by the United States and NATO.[9][59] His opinions on Russia and Ukraine have caused controversy, with some including Liz Cheney describing Macgregor as being a member of the "Putin wing of the GOP."[60][61][62][63][64]
In a fourth appearance in early March, Macgregor said a ceasefire was close as Ukrainian forces had been "grounded to bits. There's no question about that despite what we report on our mainstream media".[9] He also defended Russia's invasion in an interview on The Grayzone, saying Putin had taken great care with civilians and this was delaying his victory.[65]
In July 2022, on Real America's Voice he told Charlie Kirk that: "The war, with the exception of Kharkiv and Odesa, as far as the Russians are concerned is largely over. There is no intention to do anything else because the Russians don’t have a very large army... This nonsense that Putin wants to conquer all of Ukraine was never true. All he ever did in the Minsk agreement was ask that Russian speakers, Russian citizens inside Ukraine be treated equally before the law. That they not be penalized for being Russians."[66]
In September 2022, he again predicted on Carlson's show that “this war may be over soon”[67] and later in the month "the Ukrainian army is bled white, tens of thousands of Ukrainian troops have been killed or wounded, Ukraine is really on the ropes". Liz Cheney tweeted in response: "Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch - Why do you continually put Douglas MacGregor on @FoxNews to spread Putin's propaganda and lies? This is absolutely not in America's interest."[68][additional citation(s) needed]
De ser así, este Douglas McGregor parace es un propagandista ruso...
La única Revolución es la Revolución Moral
Martin Luther King
Martin Luther King
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Decíoa Kojak: "algo apesta"
Millions of video surveillance cameras are installed in Moscow. At the same time, terrorists, armed to the teeth, are easily moving around the city in cars with fake license plates.
Crocus has a contract with the Okhrana Federal State Unitary Enterprise of the National Guard. But the video from the lobby and other rooms where terrorists are shooting people shows no resistance from the guards. There are no guards among the dead or wounded either.
Survivors report that the guards did not check bags and clothes before entering Crocus, and the metal detectors were turned off.
Even without taking into account warnings about possible terrorist attacks from foreign embassies, the Russian authorities are already constantly reporting about increased vigilance.
Terrorists leave a "lead" in the form of a car in which they arrived and about which everything is already known.
It is reported that the very same white Renault with terrorists was detained in the Bryansk region on the way to the Ukrainian border.
Why didn't the attackers change the car the whole country was looking for? Even if they were on their way to Ukraine, why through Bryansk, where the border zone is maximally fortified and protected?
It is claimed that the building was set on fire using gasoline from canisters.
Was it really enough for a fire of this magnitude in a building built to all fire safety requirements?
Why are there no signs of automatic fire extinguishing systems working? They were checked so thoroughly after the tragedy in Kemerovo's Zimnyaya Vishnya shopping mall.
Spetsnaz drove for over an hour, even though the OMON military base is 8 minutes from Crocus.
The firefighters did not put out the fire before Spetsnaz arrived. Spetsnaz waited until they finished putting out the fire to start the assault. As if someone was interested in more casualties or the escape of terrorists.
At the moment, it is reported that the number of victims of the terrorist attack in Crocus has reached 143 people. The video shows the completely collapsed dome of the Crocus City Hall concert venue.
Millions of video surveillance cameras are installed in Moscow. At the same time, terrorists, armed to the teeth, are easily moving around the city in cars with fake license plates.
Crocus has a contract with the Okhrana Federal State Unitary Enterprise of the National Guard. But the video from the lobby and other rooms where terrorists are shooting people shows no resistance from the guards. There are no guards among the dead or wounded either.
Survivors report that the guards did not check bags and clothes before entering Crocus, and the metal detectors were turned off.
Even without taking into account warnings about possible terrorist attacks from foreign embassies, the Russian authorities are already constantly reporting about increased vigilance.
Terrorists leave a "lead" in the form of a car in which they arrived and about which everything is already known.
It is reported that the very same white Renault with terrorists was detained in the Bryansk region on the way to the Ukrainian border.
Why didn't the attackers change the car the whole country was looking for? Even if they were on their way to Ukraine, why through Bryansk, where the border zone is maximally fortified and protected?
It is claimed that the building was set on fire using gasoline from canisters.
Was it really enough for a fire of this magnitude in a building built to all fire safety requirements?
Why are there no signs of automatic fire extinguishing systems working? They were checked so thoroughly after the tragedy in Kemerovo's Zimnyaya Vishnya shopping mall.
Spetsnaz drove for over an hour, even though the OMON military base is 8 minutes from Crocus.
The firefighters did not put out the fire before Spetsnaz arrived. Spetsnaz waited until they finished putting out the fire to start the assault. As if someone was interested in more casualties or the escape of terrorists.
At the moment, it is reported that the number of victims of the terrorist attack in Crocus has reached 143 people. The video shows the completely collapsed dome of the Crocus City Hall concert venue.
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
La teoría de ISIS no tiene pies ni cabeza por las razones ya harto mencionadas.
¿Por qué renunciaron a la cerda Victoria Nuland justo cuando Disneylandia advirtió de atentados terroristas en Moscú?
Creo que por ahí van los tiros...
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Escoja Ud. Este ataque ó fue planeado por el enano para responsabilizar a Ucrania, ó permitido por el enano para responsabilizar a Ucrania.
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Alemania considera fue una operación bandera falsa
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Tanto esfuerzo burdo en señalar a Ucrania, a pesar de que la evidencia que ellos presentan es "ridicula", sugiere el motivo del enano detrás de todo esto
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Pero el Faro no es un estado policiaco
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Otro general gringo duda de la versión "ISIS-K":
- Senderos
- Mensajes: 8768
- Registrado: Dom Dic 12, 2021 3:59 pm
- Ubicación: https://www.mossad.gov.il/
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Aun con advertencias es diciil defenderse de locos que andan armados disparando dentro de un concierto, pero aun así ahi decía evitar grandes aglomeraciones y un concierto lo es, es obvio que se trato de una falla de la policia de Moscú que debió reforzar la seguridad en esos eventos.verdinegro escribió: ↑Dom Mar 24, 2024 10:19 amLa teoría de ISIS no tiene pies ni cabeza por las razones ya harto mencionadas.
¿Por qué renunciaron a la cerda Victoria Nuland justo cuando Disneylandia advirtió de atentados terroristas en Moscú?
Creo que por ahí van los tiros...
Por mucho que se simpatice con Rusia hay que reconocer los propios errores. Alguien tiene que dar explicaciones ahí, algun funcionario de inteligencia del kremlin tuvo que tener acceso a esas advertencias, decidir si tomarlas en serio dando el alerta y al parecer esto no se hizo.
Jews Are The Only Indigenous of The Ancestral Land of Israel
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
La CIA asesoró al SBU para contratar a estos mercenarios. La cerda de Victoria Nuland está detrás de todo esto. La fulana advertencia y su "renuncia" han sido la manera en que los cobardes gringos han tenido para lavarse las manos de un atentado miserable. Negación plausible, le llaman.Senderos escribió: ↑Dom Mar 24, 2024 11:24 amAun con advertencias es diciil defenderse de locos que andan armados disparando dentro de un concierto, pero aun así ahi decía evitar grandes aglomeraciones y un concierto lo es, es obvio que se trato de una falla de la policia de Moscú que debió reforzar la seguridad en esos eventos.verdinegro escribió: ↑Dom Mar 24, 2024 10:19 amLa teoría de ISIS no tiene pies ni cabeza por las razones ya harto mencionadas.
¿Por qué renunciaron a la cerda Victoria Nuland justo cuando Disneylandia advirtió de atentados terroristas en Moscú?
Creo que por ahí van los tiros...
Por mucho que se simpatice con Rusia hay que reconocer los propios errores. Alguien tiene que dar explicaciones ahí, algun funcionario de inteligencia del kremlin tuvo que tener acceso a esas advertencias, decidir si tomarlas en serio dando el alerta y al parecer esto no se hizo.
Mientras más insisten en la autoría de ISIS-K negando la implicación de Ucrania, más se delatan.
- Axio
- Mensajes: 9048
- Registrado: Vie Ene 07, 2022 10:49 pm
- Ubicación: Ex-capitanía General de Venezuela
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
de pana que es ridículo seguir analizando el tema.
compa, al faro de luz le metieron el deo por todo el medio del cul0 y no se dieron cuenta!!!!!
ellos iniciaron una guerra, ¿por qué andan lloriqueando?
mas bien tienen que dar gracias a dios que fue un tiroteo y no una bomba nuclear en pleno corazón del faro.....
compa, al faro de luz le metieron el deo por todo el medio del cul0 y no se dieron cuenta!!!!!
ellos iniciaron una guerra, ¿por qué andan lloriqueando?
mas bien tienen que dar gracias a dios que fue un tiroteo y no una bomba nuclear en pleno corazón del faro.....
La ignorancia afirma o niega rotundamente; la ciencia duda. François Marie Arouet
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Trump sabe quiénes fundaron ISIS. Obama mismo lo confesó.
Donald J. Trump es la única garantía de paz.
Donald J. Trump es la única garantía de paz.
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
La razón de fondo: justificar una movilización general
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
En 1999 el Faro hizo lo propio --ataques terroristas "falsa bandera" en ciudades rusas-- para justificar la invasión de Chechenia.
- verdinegro
- Mensajes: 15140
- Registrado: Sab Dic 18, 2021 10:30 am
- Ubicación: Evropa
- Contactar:
Re: Moscu bajo ataque
Rusia no necesita de eso para anunciar una movilización general, bolsiclón.
Nadie en Occidente se atreve a afirmar lo que estás sugiriendo. Tu rusofobia te tiene mal.En 1999 el Faro hizo lo propio --ataques terroristas "falsa bandera" en ciudades rusas-- para justificar la invasión de Chechenia.